Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates from the Sprouts
of Moth Bean (Vigna aconitifolia Jacq.)
Devendra Pratap
Singh1*, Ankit Saini2, Poonam Gupta3
1Bhagwant Institute of Pharmacy, Muzaffarnagar, India
2Krishna College of Pharmacy, Bijnor, India
3Krishna College of Science and Information
Technology, Bijnor, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mdps1341619@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Moth Bean Sprouts are well known for their
high nutritive value and digestibility. They are rich in enzymes, bioavailable vitamins, minerals, amino acids and fibers.
Survey of sprouted seeds available at retail venders has shown the presence of
various pathogenic bacteria like Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella and Klebsiella, which is of concern for health conscious
public. In the present study antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial
isolates from moth bean sprouts is done in order to determine which antimicrobial
agent is to use against specific strains of bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility
of bacterial isolates from moth bean sprouts was examined against 10
antibiotics viz. Ampicillin, Amoxycillin,
Ciprofloxacin, Chloramphenicol, Oxacillin,
Gentamicin, Voriconazole, Rifampicin, Methicillin, Norfloxacin.
KEYWORDS: Moth Bean Sprouts, Bacterial Isolates,
Antibiotic Susceptibility.
INTRODUCTION:
Use of sprouted seeds as food for human
consumption originated in the Far East and because of their nutritive value,
sprouted seeds have gained popularity worldwide. Sprouts are believed to be
highly nutritious and rich in enzymes which promote good health. Sprouts,
including mung beans and alfalfa sprouts, have become
a common food item in grocery stores, salad bars around the world. Sprouting is the practice of
germinating seeds to be eaten either raw or cooked. 1,2,3 A large number of food borne disease outbreaks
reported world over have been found to be linked to sprouts. In most instances,
the illnesses were caused by either Escherichia coli O157:H7 or Salmonella
bacteria.4
Thus
it is necessary to control the contamination of seeds meant for consumption as
sprouts or restrict the growth of pathogens during sprouting. The present study
was undertaken to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated
bacteria from moth bean sprouts.
MATERIAL AND METHODS4:
The present study was carried
out in Department of Microbiology, Sardar Bhagwan Singh Post Graduate Institute of Biomedical
Sciences and Research, Balawala, Dehradun.
Collection of Sample
Two seed samples of moth bean
were purchased from local market from two different retail shops.
Seed Sprouting
Each type of seeds (5.0g) were placed in a
sterile petri plate containing Whatmann
No. 113 (qualitative wet strengthen) filter paper saturated with sterilized
water or tap water. The seeds were incubated at room temperature (25OC).
Microbial Analysis of Seed Sprouts
Sprouts after 24, 48, 72, 96 h of sprouting
from 5.0 g of seeds were suspended in 95 ml sterile water blank. The flasks
were placed on a rotary shaker for 15 minute and ten fold
serial dilutions were prepared. Aliquots of 0.1 ml of appropriate dilutions
were spread on plate containing Mac Conkey Agar,
Brilliant Green Agar, Baired Parker’s
agar and plates were incubated at 37O C for 24 to 48 hrs.
The plates were observed after incubation
for growth and colony Characteristics. Number of different colonies appearing
on the plates was counted and number of bacteria present on each sprout was
calculated as follows
No. of Bacteria per Sprout =
Number of colonies × dilution factor ×0.1
Number of seeds
Cultural Characterization
The colonies were observed for their color,
texture, outline, opacity, pigmentation etc and different type of colonies
appearing on all the three media were counted.
Morphological Characterization
The colonies were picked and processed for
Gram staining technique to differentiate between Gram positive and Gram
negative bacteria, shape and arrangement of cells.
Media Composition
Different types of media used in the study
were Mac Conkey Agar, Brilliant Green Agar, Baired Parker’s agar etc., which were
sterilized by autoclaving at121OC for 20 minute at 15 lbs psi.
Mac
Conkey Agar Medium (pH- 7.4) 5 |
||
Ingredients |
Amount
(g/ l) |
|
Peptone |
: |
5 |
Lactose |
: |
10 |
Bile
salt |
: |
5 |
Sodium
chloride |
: |
5 |
Neutral
red |
: |
0.075 |
Agar |
: |
15 |
Brilliant
Green Agar Medium (pH- 6.9) 6 |
||
Ingredients |
Amount
(g/l) |
|
Lactose |
: |
10 |
Sucrose |
: |
10 |
Peptone |
: |
5 |
Sodium
chloride |
: |
5 |
Phenol
red |
: |
0.08 |
Brilliant
green |
: |
0.0125 |
Agar |
: |
20 |
Baired Parker’s Medium (pH-7.0) 7 |
||
Ingredients |
Amount
(g/ l) |
|
Casein
enzyme hydrolysate |
: |
10 |
Beef
extract |
: |
5 |
Yeast
extract |
: |
1 |
Glycine |
: |
12 |
Sodium
pyruvate |
: |
10 |
Lithium
chloride |
: |
5 |
Agar |
: |
20 |
Muller
Hinton Agar (pH 7.3) |
||
Ingredients |
Amount
(g/ l) |
|
Caesin acid hydrolysis |
: |
17.5 |
Beef
heart infusion |
: |
2 |
Starch
soluble |
: |
1.5 |
Agar |
: |
18 |
Drug Susceptibility (Intrinsic
Antibiotic Resistance) Test
Due to emergence of many antibiotic
resistant strains of bacteria, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is done in
order to determine which antimicrobial agent to use against specific strain of
bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion method
according to standard microbial procedures. In this method, a standard
suspension of bacteria (0.5 turbidity Mc farland
standard) to be tested was inoculated on the surface of Muller Hinton Agar
plates. Filter paper disc containing specific concentration of antimicrobial
agents were pressed onto the surface and incubated at 37OC over
night. After incubation, the zone of inhibition of growth of bacteria around
each disc was measured and the susceptibility was determined.8
Disc of following antibacterial
chemotherapeutic agents were used in this study: Ampicillin
(10mcg/disc), Amoxycillin (30/15mcg/disc),
Ciprofloxacin (10mcg/disc), Chloramphenicol
(10mcg/disc), Oxacillin (1mcg/disc), Gentamicin
(120mcg/disc), Voriconazole (1mcg/disc), Rifampicin (15mcg/disc)
Methicillin (30 mcg/disc), Norfloxacin
(10 mcg/disc).
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
In the present study antibiotic
susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates from moth bean sprouts was done.
The observations of the experiments conducted were discussed as below:
Morphological Characteristics of Selected
Isolates
List of isolates from different samples of
moth bean sprouts picked at different time interval is given in table 1.
Table 1: List of isolates from moth bean
sprouts
Sample
No. |
Media |
Colony
Characteristics |
Code
No. |
C |
Mac Conkey Agar |
Dark
pink, flat, small, circular |
I
–C1, I-C2, I-C3, I-C4 |
Light
pink with centred, gummy, dome shaped, circular |
II
–C1,II-C2,II-C3, II-C4 |
||
Brilliant
Green Agar |
Cream,
small, circular raised |
III
–C1, III-C2, III-C3, III-C4 |
|
Yellow,
gummy, large Dome
shaped, circular |
IV–C1,
IV-C2, IV-C3, I V-C4 |
||
Baired Parker’ s Agar |
Dark
black, small, circular |
V
–C1, V-C2, V-C3, V-C4 |
|
B |
Mac Conkey Agar |
Dark
pink, flat ,small ,circular |
I
–D1, I-D2, I-D3, I-D4 |
Light
pink with centred, gummy, dome shaped, circular |
II
–D1, II-D2, II-D3, II-D4 |
||
Brilliant
Green Agar |
Cream,
small, circular raised |
III
–D1, III-D2, III-D3, IIID4 |
|
Yellow,
gummy, large Dome
shaped, circular |
IV
–D1, IV-D2, IV-D3, IV-D4 |
||
Baired Parker’s Agar |
Dark
black, small, circular |
V–D1,
V-D2, V-D3, V-D4 |
Drug Susceptibility (Intrinsic Antibiotic
Resistance) of Selected Isolates
Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates
from moth bean sprouts was examined against 10 antibiotics viz
Ampicillin (10mcg/disc), Amoxycillin
(30/15mcg/disc), Ciprofloxacin (10mcg/disc), Chloramphenicol
(10mcg/disc), Oxacillin (1mcg/disc), Gentamicin (120mcg/disc), Voriconazole
(1mcg/disc), Rifampicin (15mcg/disc) Methicillin (30
mcg/disc), Norfloxacin (10 mcg/disc).
Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Escherichia
coli isolated from moth bean sprouts against 10 antibiotics were observed
(Table 2). All the 5 isolates were found to be resistant to three antibiotics i.e Voriconazole, Methicillin and Ampicillin.
Isolate number I-C2 and I-C3 were resistant to Rifamycin
also since the zone of inhibition of these isolates was 9mm only. All other
isolates were highly sensitive to the remaining antibiotics.
Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella sp. isolated from different
sprouts is given in table 3. All these isolates were resistance to antibiotics
like Voriconazole, Oxacillin,
Amoxycillin. Isolate II-C1 was resistant to Rifamycin. Isolate II-C4, II-D2, and II-D3 were moderately
sensitive to Rifamycin. All the isolates were highly
sensitive to Chloramphenicol, Gentamycin,
Voriconazol, Rifamycin and Norfloxacin.
Antibiotic sensitivity of 4 isolates of Salmonella
sp. and 2 isolates of Shigella sp.
isolated from moth bean sprouts on Brillant Green
agar against 7 antibiotics is given in table 4 and 5. On the basis of size of
zone of inhibition all the isolates of Salmonella sp. and Shigella sp. were found to be resistant to
the Voriconazole and Oxacillin.
Isolates viz. IV-C2, IV-C3 were moderately sensitive to Amoxicillin.
Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Staphylococcus
aureus isolated from moth bean sprouts was also
studied. The observations are given in table 6. Eight isolates were tested and
found to be resistant to Voriconzole, Methicillin and Oxacillin and
were highly sensitive to the 5 remaining antibiotics namely Amoxycillin,
Chloromphenicol, Amipicillin,
Gentamycin and Ciprofloxacin.
Table 2: Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of E.
coli isolated from Moth Bean Sprouts
Isolate no. |
Antibiotics
(Zone of Inhibition mm) |
|||||||
Cf10 |
C10 |
AS10 |
G120 |
VO R1 |
Ox1 |
Rf15 |
M30 |
|
I-C2 |
38 |
23 |
_ |
27 |
_ |
27 |
9 |
_ |
I-C3 |
27 |
22 |
_ |
24 |
_ |
22 |
9 |
_ |
I-C4 |
29 |
27 |
_ |
28 |
_ |
30 |
12 |
_ |
I-D3 |
31 |
20 |
_ |
26 |
_ |
25 |
18 |
_ |
I-D4 |
26 |
25 |
_ |
22 |
_ |
23 |
16 |
_ |
G –Gentamicin
, VOR –Voriconazole
, C_Chloromphenicol, Ox- Oxacillin,
Cf -
Ciprofloxacin, Rf -Rifampicin
, A –Ampicillin, M-methicillin
Figures in superscript indicate
concentration (mcg) of antibiotics.
Table 3: Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Klebsiella isolated from Moth Bean Sprouts
Isolate no. |
Antibiotics
(Zone of Inhibition mm) |
|||||||
Cf10 |
C10 |
AS10 |
G120 |
VO R1 |
Ox1 |
Rf15 |
Nf10 |
|
II--C1 |
32 |
31 |
_ |
21 |
_ |
_ |
9 |
24 |
II-C2 |
34 |
26 |
_ |
18 |
_ |
_ |
14 |
21 |
II-C3 |
25 |
20 |
_ |
19 |
_ |
_ |
12 |
23 |
II-C4 |
27 |
21 |
_ |
21 |
_ |
_ |
12 |
25 |
II-D1 |
26 |
28 |
_ |
22 |
_ |
_ |
18 |
28 |
II-D2 |
30 |
32 |
_ |
27 |
_ |
_ |
14 |
27 |
II-D3 |
22 |
32 |
_ |
26 |
_ |
_ |
12 |
21 |
II-D4 |
23 |
27 |
_ |
23 |
_ |
_ |
10 |
24 |
G–Gentamicin,
VOR-Voriconazole,
C - Chloromphenicol, Cf - Ciprofloxacin, Rf - Rifampicin , A- Ampicillin, Nf- Norfloxacin, Ox- Oxacillin
Figures in superscript indicate
concentration (mcg) of antibiotics
Table 4: Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern Salmonella
spp isolated from Moth Bean Sprouts
Isolate no. |
Antibiotics
Zone of inhibition (mm) |
||||||
CF10 |
C 10 |
AS10 |
G120 |
VO R1 |
OX1 |
AM S30/15 |
|
IV-C1 |
31 |
21 |
24 |
23 |
_ |
_ |
21 |
IV-C2 |
30 |
24 |
22 |
22 |
_ |
_ |
15 |
IV-C3 |
29 |
20 |
28 |
27 |
_ |
_ |
14 |
IV-D2 |
34 |
25 |
21 |
21 |
_ |
_ |
16 |
G–Gentamicin ,VOR –Voriconazole
, C-Chloromphenicol
, Cf
-Ciprofloxacin, A -Ampicillin, OX – Oxacillin, AMS –Amoxacillin
Figures in superscript indicate
concentration (μg) of antibiotics
Table 5: Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern Shigella isolated from Moth Bean Sprouts
Isolate no. |
Antibiotics
Zone of inhibition (mm) |
||||||
CF10 |
C 10 |
AS10 |
G120 |
VOR1 |
OX1 |
AM S30/15 |
|
IV-C4 |
30 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
_ |
_ |
17 |
IV-D1 |
32 |
22 |
23 |
27 |
_ |
_ |
15 |
G–Gentamicin ,VOR –Voriconazole
, C-Chloromphenicol
, Cf -
Ciprofloxacin, A -Ampicillin, OX – Oxacillin, AMS –Amoxacillin
Figures in superscript indicate
concentration (μg) of antibiotics
Table 6: Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Staphylococcus
aureus isolated from Moth Bean Sprouts
Isolate no. |
Antibiotics
Zone of inhibition (mm) |
||||||
Cf10 |
C 10 |
AS10 |
G120 |
VOR1 |
OX1 |
AMS30/15 |
|
V-C1 |
31 |
21 |
27 |
29 |
_ |
_ |
27 |
V-C2 |
31 |
24 |
23 |
26 |
_ |
_ |
30 |
V-C3 |
30 |
28 |
28 |
27 |
_ |
_ |
28 |
V-C4 |
32 |
29 |
25 |
24 |
_ |
_ |
32 |
V-D1 |
34 |
27 |
26 |
23 |
_ |
_ |
27 |
V-D2 |
31 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
_ |
_ |
29 |
V-D3 |
29 |
25 |
23 |
26 |
_ |
_ |
30 |
V-D4 |
33 |
21 |
28 |
28 |
_ |
_ |
31 |
G–Gentamicin,
VOR–Voriconazole ,
C- Chloromphenicol, Cf -
Ciprofloxacin, AS-Ampicillin, OX–Oxacillin,
AMS –Amoxycillin
Figures in superscript indicate
concentration (mcg) of antibiotics
SUMMERY AND CONCLUSION:
The present study was undertaken to
determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated bacteria from moth bean
sprouts against 10 antibiotics viz. Ampicillin, Amoxycillin, Ciprofloxacin, Chloramphenicol,
Oxacillin, Gentamicin, Voriconazole, Rifampicin, Methicillin, Norfloxacin.
Ø The isolates were picked from
different samples on two types of media and purified for morphological
characterization. They were found belonging to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella
and Staphylococcus aureus.
Ø The antibiotic susceptibility
pattern of all the isolates was also determined. Isolates found from Escherichia
coli were resistant to Ampicillin, Methicillin, and Voriconazole
whereas isolates belonging to Klebsiella
spp. were resistant to Ampicillin, Voriconazole, and Oxacillin.
Ø All the isolates of Salmonella
spp. and Shigella spp. isolated on Brilliant
Green Agar were resistant to Oxacillin and Voriconazole. Likewise all the isolates of Staphylococcus
aureus isolated on Baired
Parker’s medium were also resistant to Oxacillin, Methicillin and Voriconazole.
Ø Thus care should be taken in the
consumption of the raw moth sprouts irrespective of their source i.e. whether
prepared at home or procured from the retail market.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The Authors of this research articles are heartily thankful to their
Guide and Head of Department of Microbiology, Sardar Bhagwan Singh Post Graduate Institute of Biomedical
Sciences and Research, Balawala, Dehradun
to provide all necessary help to construct such a fruitful work.
REFERENCE:
1.
J. Augustin, B. P. Klein; Nutrient
content of sprouted wheat and selected legumes, Cereal Foods World,
1983, 28, 58–361.
2.
J. R. Fordham, C. E. Wells, L. H. Chen; Sprouting of seeds and
nutrient composition of seeds and sprouts, J. Food Sci., 1975, 40, 552–556.
3. A. M. Kylen,
R. M. McCready; Nutrients in seeds and sprouts of
alfalfa, lentils, mung beans and soybeans, J. Food
Sci, 1975,
40, 1008–1009.
4. Shilpi Chauhan,
Ankit Saini, Devendra Pratap Singh, Girendra K. Gautam, Poonam Gupta. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial
isolates from the sprouts of moth bean (Vigna Radiate L.),
J. Pharm. and Biomed. Analysis Letters,
2013, 1(1), 40-44.
5. www.himedialabs.com/TD/M081B.pdf
(Accessed on February, 2012).
6. www.himedialabs.com/TD/M016.pdf
(Accessed on February, 2012).
7. www.himedialabs.com/TD/M043.pdf
(Accessed on February, 2012).
8. www.microrao.com/micronotes/antibiotics.pdf
(Accessed on July, 2012).
Received on 26.12.2013 Modified on 25.01.2014
Accepted on 05.02.2014 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J.
Pharm. Dosage Form. and Tech. 6(2):April- June
2014; Page 81-84